Search
Eric Magnuson, Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP Photo

Eric P. Magnuson

Co-Chair, Business Litigation Practice Group / Boston

Overview

Eric Magnuson litigates high-stakes commercial disputes in state and federal courts. He tries cases, argues appeals, and leads dispositive strategy. His practice includes class-action defense, business and fiduciary disputes, insurance litigation, and other matters involving significant financial or regulatory exposure. Clients engage him to assess risk early, sequence litigation decisions, and position cases for favorable resolution through structured analysis grounded in judgment.

Eric co-chairs the firm’s Business Litigation Practice Group. He was named a 2024 “Go To Business Litigation Lawyer” by Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly and is regularly quoted by the publication on civil procedure, evidentiary practice, and fiduciary law. He chairs the firm’s Professional Responsibility Committee and serves on its AI Committee. He is Senior Editor of the BLS Blog and serves on the Massachusetts Advisory Council of the New England Legal Foundation.

Eric served as Executive Note Editor of the Arizona Law Review.

Outside the office, Eric competes in the National Ultra Endurance (NUE) mountain-bike series, where he won the Epic Series Masters championship in 2022 and 2024.

Representative Experience

Commercial Litigation

  • Reading Co-operative Bank v. Suffolk Construction Company, Inc., 464 Mass. 543 (2013). Served as trial and appellate counsel for a bank pursuing claims under Article 9 of the UCC. Prevailed at trial and on appeal, securing a nearly $8 million judgment. Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly named the decision one of the most important commercial decisions of the year.
  • Unibank for Savings v. 999 Private Jet, LLC, 31 F.4th 1 (1st Cir. 2022). Represented Unibank in a dispute over a promissory note secured by a Gulfstream aircraft. Prevailed on appeal, securing affirmance of summary judgment against an intervenor asserting an alleged superior security interest.
  • Formulatrix, Inc. v. Rigaku Automation, Inc., No. CV 15-12725-JGD, 2018 WL 5723149 (D. Mass. Nov. 1, 2018). Represented defendants and counterclaimants in litigation arising from a customer support agreement involving complex contractual and related claims. Prevailed at the motion-to-dismiss stage and on summary judgment.
  • OpenRisk, LLC v. Roston, 90 Mass. App. Ct. 1107 (2016). Represented defendants sued for alleged trade-secret misappropriation. Secured dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction, rejecting the theory that a defendant can be subject to jurisdiction based on the forum contacts of alleged co-conspirators. The dismissal was affirmed on appeal.
  • Monette v. Citation Insurance Company, No. 2084CV2626-BLS1 (2023). Secured summary judgment for an insurer in a putative class action challenging estimating practices for homeowners policies under G.L. c. 175 and c. 93A. The plaintiff withdrew the appeal, and final judgment entered.

Insurance Class Action

Served as lead briefing counsel in a series of class actions and appeals shaping Massachusetts automobile insurance law.

  • Cubberley v. The Commerce Insurance Company, 495 Mass. 289 (2025). Prevailed in a putative class action on two questions of first impression: whether the Commissioner of Insurance exceeded his statutory authority by approving an exclusion of diminished-value damages in the standard automobile policy, and whether a third-party claimant must obtain a judgment against the insured before suing the insurer for breach of contract.
  • Parsons v. The Commerce Insurance Company, No. 2084CV00659-BLS2, 2025 WL 1707080 (Mass. Super. June 17, 2025). Defeated class certification in action alleging improper total-loss valuations affecting more than 125,000 claimants and asserting damages of up to $64 million.
  • Ercolini v. The Commerce Insurance Company(consolidated with McGilloway v. Safety Insurance Company, 488 Mass. 610 (2021)). Following the Supreme Judicial Court’s ruling that automobile owners could recover inherent diminished value damages, defeated class certification on remand.
  • Ramirez v. The Commerce Insurance Company, 91 Mass. App. Ct. 144 (2017). Secured summary judgment, affirmed on appeal, in a putative class action seeking recovery of sales tax on behalf of third-party claimants.

Experience

Experience

  • Won Verdict and Multi-Million Judgment on Behalf of Bank in Article 9 Litigation

    Served as trial counsel for bank in a multi-week jury trial resulting in a verdict finding breach of contract and violation of Article 9 (Secured Transactions) of the UCC against a major construction company. The case arose out of the triangular relationship between the bank, the construction company, and its subcontractor. Despite receiving notice of an assignment of the subcontractor’s account receivables to the bank, the construction company issued multiple payments to the subcontractor. Overcoming a multitude of defenses, the bank was awarded a judgment of more than $3 million, plus prejudgment interest.

  • Won Summary Judgment on Behalf of Directors in Insurance Litigation

    Obtained summary judgment on behalf of directors in a litigation against an insurer that disclaimed coverage under a D&O policy.

  • Successfully Defended Bank in ATM Litigation

    Represented bank in an action arising under the Electronic Fund Transfer Act. The plaintiff claimed that the bank violated EFTA by failing to post a physical notice of a $2.00 ATM fee. The plaintiff sought damages, costs, and attorneys’ fees. The bank counterclaimed, alleging that the lawsuit was commenced in bad faith. The bank also moved to dismiss the litigation, arguing that the plaintiff did not have constitutional standing to pursue the claim. Shortly after receiving the motion to dismiss, the plaintiff proposed that the parties dismiss their claims with prejudice, with the bank paying no damages, costs, or fees to the plaintiff.

  • Won Judgment in Favor of Defendant Facing G.L. c. 93A Claim

    Served as trial counsel for individual defendant who was facing claims for alleged violations of G.L. c. 93A. After trial and post-trial briefing, the court entered judgment in favor of the defendant, finding no legal or factual basis for 93A liability.

  • Won Asylum Trial

    Served as trial counsel for individual seeking asylum. The individual was in the United States after fleeing Cameroon because of political persecution. At the conclusion of the trial, the individual was awarded asylum.

  • Successfully Defended Company in Major Bankruptcy Litigation

    Successfully represented Fortune 500 company against claims in excess of $20 million for alleged breaches of fiduciary duty and fraudulent transfers.

News & Insights

News

Publications

Blog Posts

Honors

Honors

  • Chambers USA, Leading U.S. Litigation: General Commercial Attorney, 2026
  • Legal 500, Boston City Elite, 2025-2026
  • Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, “Go To Business Litigation Lawyer,” 2024
  • Massachusetts Super Lawyers, 2014-2025
  • Massachusetts Super Lawyers Rising Stars, 2005-2007

Education & Admissions

Education

University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law, J.D., cum laude

Calvin College, B.A.

Admissions

  • U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
  • Massachusetts
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circut 
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circut 

In the Community

Eric is involved in numerous professional organizations, including the Boston of Inn of Court, the Boston Bar Association, the Federalist Society, the International Association of Privacy Professionals, and the Defense Research Institute. He serves on the Massachusetts Advisory Council of the New England Legal Foundation (NELF).

Noteworthy

  • Chambers USA, Leading U.S. Litigation: General Commercial Attorney, 2026
  • Legal 500, Boston City Elite, 2025-2026
  • Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, “Go To Business Litigation Lawyer,” 2024
  • Massachusetts Super Lawyers, 2014-2025
  • Massachusetts Super Lawyers Rising Stars, 2005-2007
Back to Page