Search

Trending publication

Christopher Lindstrom Publishes “MA Superior Court Rules in TIBCO Software v. Zephyr Health, Inc.

Print PDF
| Article

Christopher H. Lindstrom, a partner in the Labor, Employment and Benefits practice group, published “MA Superior Court Rules in TIBCO Software v. Zephyr Health, Inc.” on the ABA Business Torts Subcommittee website on June 3. The article discusses how the recent decision from the Business Litigation Session of the Massachusetts Superior Court has broad implications for non-compete cases involving arbitration clauses. In TIBCO Software, Inc. v. Zephyr Health, Inc. and Kevin Willoe, the court denied an employer’s motion for a temporary restraining order enforcing a non-compete, finding the employer’s own arbitration provision required it to pursue its restrictive covenant claims before the American Arbitration Association (AAA) in California.

The judge noted that the arbitrator would be authorized to issue preliminary injunctive relief but that if there was any delay in arbitration, then the employer could request an emergency hearing on its motion for a preliminary injunction. However, the employer first would have to take its case to the AAA. Although it was not entirely clear from the decision, presumably the employment contract at issue did not contain a typical arbitration carve-out clause permitting the employer to seek emergency injunctive relief in court.

Christopher notes that this decision thus serves as an important reminder to businesses to carefully draft non-competes and to understand the full implications of the growing use of arbitration clauses. Here, the employer presumably included the arbitration clause in its employment agreement to require its employees to enter arbitration with respect to employee-asserted claims in an effort to reduce costs—without contemplating the ramifications on enforcing the restrictive covenant in another part of the agreement. They point out that given the urgent need to obtain injunctive relief in a non-compete case, and the often tortured path to selecting an arbitrator or panel, employers will want to avoid any such delay associated with arbitration.

To view the article, click here.

More Publications >
Back to Page

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek