Search
Summary Enforcement of Settlement Agreement Not Appropriate Due to Ambiguity
Summary Enforcement of Settlement Agreement Not Appropriate Due to Ambiguity

In Flessas v. Rouisse, Judge Davis denied “dueling motions” seeking enforcement of the parties’ settlement agreement. The settlement agreement arose out of a dispute in which Costas Flessas alleged that he was fraudulently induced into purchasing a 15% interest in the Essex Sports Center, LLC, which operates an indoor sports facility. The settlement agreement provided that certain defendants would purchase Flessas’ ownership interest, who would thereafter release his claims.

Scott Rouisse, named as a defendant in the case, was not a party to the settlement agreement. The agreement stated, however, that Flessas was required to release all “Defendants, as well as their respective employees, agents, representatives . . ., which expressly excludes Scott Rouisse only to the extent necessary for Defendants, not Flessas, to pursue the claims after Flessas receives [the settlement payment].” Flessas maintained that he could proceed with his individual claims against Rouisse. Conversely, the defendants argued that the agreement allowed only “Defendants, not Flessas, to pursue the claims” against Rouisse.

Under Massachusetts law, “a court has the inherent authority to summarily enforce an agreed-upon settlement between litigating parties.” Summary enforcement of a settlement agreement is not appropriate, however, when the terms of the agreement are ambiguous or imprecise.

Denying both motions, Judge Davis ruled that the settlement agreement was ambiguous about whether Flessas could pursue individual claims against Rouisse. An evidentiary hearing, according to Judge Davis, would be necessary to resolve the ambiguity.

The Business Litigation Session of the Massachusetts Superior Court

Docket Number: 1784CV04034-BLS1

Case Name: Flessas v. Rouisse, et al.

Dates of Decision: December 2, 2019

Judge: Brian A. Davis

Justice: Justice Davis

Blog Editor

Recent Posts

Back to Page

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek